| |
| |
| MEDIA COVERAGE |
| |
| Contract research gains pace in Karnataka
Express Pharma, Feb 1-15th, 2006 |
| |
| A beneficiary from the runaway success of the Indian BPO
industry is the CRO community. Why is clinical research
on the rise, and what is the future for the Indian CRO industry?
Deepali Gupta explores. |
| |
Currently
pegged at close to $100 million, the Indian CRO market,
in an optimistic estimate, is likely to grow three-fold
in a span of just five years. As Contract Research and Manufacturing
Services (CRAMS) has been a lucrative and ever growing industry
around the world, recent years have seen a major outsourcing
of these services to India. The reason is simple. India
is still riding the outsourcing wave.
The boom in outsourced services for IT earned a reputation
for Indian firms in international circles. It established
a credibility and comfort level for MNCs to offshore some
of their non-core yet vital tasks to India. Time proved
that Indians are capable of handling latest technology and
providing world-class services. It also confirmed the fact
that Indian firms are capable of rising to the occasion
and establishing appropriate infrastructure, particularly
IT, when required. |
| |
| Reason for the CRO boom |
| |
As
new drug pipelines of the large pharma companies begin to
dry up, it has become critical for organisations to try
permutations and combinations to increase the product lifecycle
of existing products. "This presents an opportunity for
Indian CROs to provide innovative studies for old and existing
molecules as well as cocktail drugs," says Nailesh Bhatt,
Managing Director, Proximare.
In addition, numerous products have gone off patent, post
GATT and ANDAs for the drugs have correspondingly been on
the rise. That spells good news for the Indian CRO industry,
because it implies that more companies are seeking to conduct
studies to prove the effectiveness of slightly modified
treatments that have proved successful in the past. "The
drying pipelines won't have a major impact on the clinical
trials industry. On the contrary the industry is bound to
grow," says Dr Mary Francis, CEO, Ace Biomed. |
| |
Besides,
the big pharmacos who are running out of new products, are
being replaced by smaller biotech companies that are trying
variations of treatments leading to further clinical research.
"Stem cell therapeutics, monoclonal antibodies and rDNA
products are expected to overtake traditional therapies,"
explains Dr Ramanand Nadig, Chief Operating Officer, Manipal
Acunova.
An increased amount of activity in clinical trials has also
been observed due to more firms in alternative medicine,
such as Ayurveda and homeopathy, entering trials to scientifically
prove the efficacy of their treatments vis-à-vis allopathic
medication. |
| What services |
| |
| The CRO industry provides multiple services to pharma
companies. As Bhatt observes, buyers today are looking for
a one-stop shop. Formerly, the focus of clinical research
conducted in India was primarily bioavailability and bio-equivalence
studies. In the recent past, CROs have expanded their portfolios
to include pre-clinical trials, Phase I-IV trials, data
management and site management. |
| |
In
addition to the entire suite of services, Indian CROs have
foundinnovative ways to provide value-adds, primarily by
helping in study design, and reducing time and cost of studies.
That is possible because Indian CROs are comfortable with
using innovative technology to manage the processes in error-free
ways.
Manipal Acunova conducts clinical trials for several Indian
and multinational firms. Right now, says Nadig, the CRO
provides for Phase II and III trials for international clients,
and Phase I and II for Indian organisations. The key therapeutic
areas currently include oncology, psychiatry, neurology,
endocrinology, cardiovascular, stem cell and radiology and
devices. |
| |
Schedule
Y restricts CROs from testing new chemical entities discovered
overseas, which is why Phase I trials are only meant for
Indian clients. However, Indian clients only have a limited
number of Phase III and Phase IV trials, perhaps because
the upcoming research community is yet to reach that stage.
"We can surely provide Phase III and IV studies to our Indian
clients, but the current break-up is such that most Indian
clients are doing Phase I and II, and the international
ones need Phase II and III," explains Nadig. |
| Advantage India |
| |
Apart from the BPO wave, India has many benefits to offer
organisations seeking to outsource clinical research services
to India. The foremost is the fluency in English, and therefore
the ease with which we adopt documentation and communication
processes. The next most crucial factor in India's favour
is the cost advantage. While McKinsey studies suggest that
clinical research in India is one-fourth the cost of research
in developed markets, a more conservative estimate from
Ernst & Young suggests that Phase II and Phase III trials
in India are 60 percent cheaper than in Europe or America.
Other advantages include: patient diversity and heterogeneity;
familiarity with western medical facilities and proficiency
in allopathic medical practice; cost efficiency; reduced
timelines and easy patient recruitment; internationally
certified centralised lab facilities; project management
competencies and a dedicated follow through to complete
tasks; and amenable yet confidence-inspiring regulations.
Indeed, the ICH-GCP guidelines, critical for reliable clinical
research, have been mandated in India, unlike the rest of
the world. "Indian regulatory authorities (DCGI, ICMR) have
issued the Indian version of GCP which is in compliance
with ICH-GCP. India is the only country which has made GCP
a regulation for conduct of clinical trials whereas it is
a guideline in the rest of the world," explains Nadig. To
the credit of the government, the TRIPs agreement protects
organisations from patent infringement, and that has further
aided the boost to the Indian CRO sector. |
| |
| Profiling the patient |
| |
Clinical research is one industry that actually stands
to benefit from the population explosion in India. The multicultural
environment in India accounts for a diverse patient population
in terms of both lifestyle and genetic make up, in research.
The large numbers enable CROs here to hire a large sample
size of patients that fits into the required profile.
The other advantage of Indian patients for clinical trials
is that the healthcare culture here is still conservative.
Therefore, unlike a large section of the population in developed
markets, people cannot afford and consciously avoid self-medication
for every little problem. This means that the drugs administered
during trials will usually not interfere with other medicines,
and the systems of the patients will react ab initio, rather
than displaying suspect symptoms. |
| |
| Trouble at hand |
| |
The Indian CRO industry has a lot going for it. Nevertheless,
it is not entirely problem-free. Many have raised ethical
alerts in the recruitment process of Indian patients. Often
the patients are uneducated, or only partly educated. It
has been argued that these people do not know what they
are getting into when enrolling for a trial. Giving them
money for these studies may be treated as coercion.
The converse of course is that these are poor people who
cannot afford treatment. In the normal course, they would
suffer, eventually be incapable of working and become a
liability to their families. At least this way they continue
to earn, and will possibly be cured. The approval process
to clear clinical trials and initiate action still takes
longer in India than elsewhere. Several members in the community
are distressed as the government takes up to 90 days to
clear studies. While the government has been trying to reduce
the time, it is also important to remember that health matters
are sensitive, and any such path has to be tread carefully.
A more recent concern in the industry is that of qualified
staff. As the industry flourishes, there is a need for a
workforce that is not only qualified on paper, but also
effective in practice. Francis admits freely, that currently,
"There is a dearth of quality personnel in this industry."
In fact, it is crucial for the CRO community to be perceived
as one that can deliver as much as the certificates promise.
"More than paper standards, it is the overall belief, SOPs,
and attitude of the company that enable a company to win
global contracts. Parameters that are required include good
management, financial strength, technical capabilities and
infrastructure," says Bhatt.
Despite being one of the few countries that mandates ICH-GCP
practice for clinical trials, there are other country-specific
regulations such as 21 CFR Part 11 for the US, that outsourcing
partners will have to be conscious of and compliant with.
|
| |
| Here to stay |
| |
| At present, Nadig estimates, "India has been contributing
to 10-15 percent of the patient population in clinical trials,
but it's likely that India and China will occupy the prime
place contributing to over 50 percent in the near future."
As such, the trend to outsource is here to stay, driven
by economics. However, India must ensure a competitive edge
over China and competitors from Eastern Europe, because
the language barrier in other countries will be bridged
sooner rather than later. Then the quality would speak for
itself. Until then the Indian CROs have to tread the fine
line of maintaining low cost and high quality. |
| |
| Go back to media coverage |